Gardenscapes: The Loyal Player and the Unfaithful Playrix

Veteran players and Playrix face off in an arm-wrestling match inside a castle-like hall, with players cheering on one side and suited Playrix officials watching on the other.

Why veteran Gardenscapes players feel betrayed by Playrix after years of loyalty, removed mechanics, tougher changes, and growing monetization pressure.

Veteran players and Playrix have been locked in a battle for quite some time now, and we are here to comment on this increasingly dramatic affair...

We do not know whether it was sheer frustration that, over the past two years, has pushed quite a few veteran players to lash out at the company in some pretty harsh language. But if frustration really was the reason, Playrix certainly did not seem to be getting the message.

Players may complain in communities and on social media, swear up a storm over the difficulty, the changes, and the monetization, but the important thing is that they are still playing Gardenscapes. The intensity of those reactions often shows just how much they still care about the game.

And somehow, in the eyes of many longtime players, Playrix ends up looking like the unfaithful one!

The Crisis and D-Day

One thing led to another, and Gardenscapes suddenly found itself dealing with an internal crisis that goes far beyond level difficulty. It is about the balance of the game, the habits players developed over the years, and, above all, the relationship of trust between Playrix and the people who stayed with the game for so long.

At the same time, Playrix appears to be moving toward a model that increasingly resembles Candy Crush Saga: a game built for an extremely long lifespan, with a constant flow of new content, frequent events, and a powerful free-to-play monetization model.

Meanwhile, Playrix, which has now become something of an enemy in the eyes of many longtime players, has removed the Glove from the game—one of the tools players most often ask to have back—while taking an even harder line, rolling out update after update, and putting new elements on the market... uh... into the game, I mean. Sorry, that slipped out!

I am laughing as I write this, even though the whole situation is turning into quite a battle. And that only makes the contrast more interesting: the players seem to be showing more loyalty to Gardenscapes than Playrix is showing to the habits and expectations of its longtime players.

Candy Crush Saga, Royal Match, and Royal Kingdom

At the height of all this madness, with all the wheeling and dealing that seems to be so fashionable these days, an opportunity is opening up for the competition. The more Playrix removes beloved tools, increases the pressure, and changes mechanics longtime players once took for granted, the larger the pool of frustrated players who may be willing to try another game.

The hard part for the competition is not getting that first download. It is convincing someone who has invested years in Gardenscapes to walk away from their progress, their team, and a deeply ingrained habit. But if Playrix keeps adding to that frustration, companies such as King and Dream Games are being handed a rare opportunity: the chance to win over players who, until recently, would never even have considered leaving.

Man, the things we’ve seen!

The Chicken and the Egg

From what I can tell—and I think the reaction is understandable—a whole lot of players have become fed up, angry, and openly hostile toward Playrix, feeling that the company has betrayed their trust and affection and is now biting the hand that helped feed it.

That opens up a much bigger debate, one that may lead straight back to the age-old question: which came first, the chicken or the egg?

In this case, though, I tend to think that veteran players did more to help build Gardenscapes into a long-term success—and, by extension, contributed significantly to the success it brought Playrix—than Playrix did on its own to create that level of loyalty. Players stayed in the “henhouse” for years. They grew alongside the game, built teams and communities, developed daily routines around it, and helped turn Gardenscapes into a game with millions of downloads and extraordinary staying power.

Of course, beyond the metaphors, this is really a matter of interpretation and gameplay analysis: who ultimately comes out ahead, and who ends up losing, in this increasingly tough tug-of-war?

Who Will Foot the Bill?

In other words, who will end up taking the blame for the losses, and who will get the credit for the gains in a conflict where Gardenscapes still holds a major advantage thanks to habit and nearly a decade of gameplay that cannot simply be erased from players’ memories?

Over roughly the past two years, two issues have come up again and again in player discussions. On the one hand, Playrix has removed or changed tools and mechanics that many players considered important. On the other, a growing number of players feel that the handling of technical problems is no longer at the level they would expect.

Playrix is still playing White in this chess match. It decides the mechanics, the difficulty, the events, the rewards, and the changes. The question is whether it can keep these players active and get them to adapt, or whether it will leave them slugging it out across social media and player communities until they finally get tired for good.

You cannot force a relationship to work, and since Playrix has chosen this increasingly hard-line approach, this is where the rubber meets the road. Now we get to see what the players will actually do.

There is also an old saying famously used by John F. Kennedy: “Victory has a hundred fathers and defeat is an orphan.” And in the case of Gardenscapes, there are plenty of “fathers” behind its success. Playrix rightly deserves credit for creating and developing the game, but veteran players also have every reason to believe that without their years of loyalty, daily participation, and continued presence, that success would not have lasted as long as it has.

The comparison is especially interesting here. After so many successful years, who believes they owe more to the other? Does Playrix owe more to the loyal players who helped keep the game alive, or do the players owe more to Playrix for giving them a game they kept returning to every day for years?

As we have already seen, many players feel betrayed and disappointed by Playrix’s direction. But I have the impression that the people who were shaken the most were the veterans who, for all those previous years, had treated Playrix as if it could do no wrong.

The Players’ Praise

It is rare to see so many players of a mobile game talk about years of daily play, teams that turned into groups of friends, thousands or even tens of thousands of levels, and a game that became part of their everyday lives. What makes this even more significant is that this relationship between players and Gardenscapes did not begin yesterday. It has been developing for years.

Some players describe Gardenscapes as an excellent combination of building and match-3 gameplay, speak enthusiastically about the game, and say they want to keep playing for a long time. Others remember levels that gave them trouble, the number of attempts it took to beat them, and the satisfaction they felt when they finally made it through.

There are also players who begin by saying how much they love Gardenscapes and how many years they have been playing, only to explain in the very next breath that the changes have disappointed them so much that they have started looking for another game. Loving Gardenscapes and being unhappy with the direction it is taking can now exist in the very same story.

Others talk about years of playing every day, buying passes because they felt the creators of a game they enjoyed deserved their support, being part of strong teams, and having a relationship with Gardenscapes that went far beyond simply opening the game, playing a few levels, and leaving. For some of them, their team was one of the main reasons they kept playing even after they began disagreeing with the direction of the game.

Some veterans even describe Gardenscapes as the game they used to turn to when they wanted to unwind and escape from stress. After years of investing time and, in many cases, money, some of those same players have now cut back dramatically or started searching for something else that might give them that same feeling.

These are not the reactions of people who never liked Gardenscapes in the first place. Quite the opposite. These are players who loved the game, made it part of their daily lives, stayed for years, and, in many cases, spent money to support it. That is why their disappointment today carries far more weight than a frustrated outburst after one difficult level.

The Historians of the Future

If gaming historians ever try to explain how a mobile game managed to keep players around for nearly a decade while, at the same time, some of those very same players came to feel that the company behind it was no longer listening to them, Gardenscapes will make a fascinating case study.

Veteran players are the very essence of Gardenscapes. Their importance goes far beyond the level they have reached or the number of years they have played. It is about how they read the game, understand its mechanics, help their teams, and adapt to every new change. Nobody can keep playing forever with exactly the same patience and dedication, but Playrix knows very well how important these players are to the game.

Veterans play the way years of Gardenscapes taught them to play. They are not simply people who clear levels. They are the ones who know when a level is genuinely difficult, when a mechanic is working properly, and when a change makes the game worse. They have watched Gardenscapes change again and again, and they can tell the difference between genuine evolution and simply turning up the pressure.

It almost goes without saying how important they are to Playrix. The way they keep teams alive, participate in events, talk about the game every day, and continue coming back year after year is a huge part of Gardenscapes’ strength.

The question is whether Playrix still sees these people as part of the foundation on which the game was built, or whether it now assumes that no matter what changes, they will simply keep playing.

And perhaps that is what future historians would find most interesting: not how many levels Gardenscapes eventually reached or how much money it generated, but how it handled its relationship with longtime players who stayed with it longer than anyone else.

Graveyards Are Full of Indispensable People...

In the end, Playrix is what it is, and with Gardenscapes it became what it was destined to become.

What exactly is happening right now and what happens from here are both uncertain. Either way, life goes on for Playrix and for its veteran players.

Playrix most likely believes that the majority will eventually adapt. The players, on the other hand, may believe that sooner or later the company will be forced to listen more closely to the people who have stayed with it for all these years.

Somewhere between those two beliefs, the next chapter of their relationship will be decided.

As an old saying goes:

“Graveyards are full of indispensable people.”

And perhaps, in the end, that applies to both sides.

Nik Marlow, Gardenscapes Team Leader

Join the Gardenscapes Strategy Community

If you enjoy discussing Gardenscapes levels, events, teams, game mechanics, and updates, you can join the Gardenscapes Strategy Facebook community and connect with other players.

Join the Gardenscapes Strategy Facebook Group